<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymity on the Internet:  Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floor9.com/blogging/anonymity-on-the-internet-part-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floor9.com/blogging/anonymity-on-the-internet-part-2</link>
	<description>live from downtown harrisburg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:59:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: weaver95</title>
		<link>http://floor9.com/blogging/anonymity-on-the-internet-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-9002</link>
		<dc:creator>weaver95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floor9.com/?p=698#comment-9002</guid>
		<description>the implications of this ruling are interesting.  I wonder if the common sense provisions would withstand an appeal?  Call my cynical if you must, but I don&#039;t have a lot of confidence in the legal system when it comes to the realities of life in an online, wi-fi world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the implications of this ruling are interesting.  I wonder if the common sense provisions would withstand an appeal?  Call my cynical if you must, but I don&#8217;t have a lot of confidence in the legal system when it comes to the realities of life in an online, wi-fi world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
