Harrisburg Bridges
By floor9 on Aug 2, 2007 in Central PA
Following yesterday’s collapse in Minnesota, I wanted to see how Harrisburg’s bridges stacked up. The information here is taken from nationalbridges.com, which provides database access to the National Bridge Inventory.
Harvey Taylor: Built 1951. Sufficiency rating of 53.7%. Deck condition: Good. Superstructure Condition: Fair. Structural Evaluation: “Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place”. This looks to be the worst of our arterial bridges.
John Harris (I-83): Built 1960 (pretty much all of our Interstates were built in the 1960s). Sufficiency rating: 73%. Deck: Good. Superstructure: Fair. Structural Evaluation: “Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place”. Note that this is considered two bridges; one for the river and one for the land. The land is rated more or less the same, except that the deck is “satisfactory”.
State Street: Built 1930. Superstructure: Fair. Substructure: Fair. Structural Evaluation “Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place”. Reassuring to know that so many of our bridges are “somewhat better than barely adequate”. Sufficiency rating: 75.4%.
81 / 22 Interchange: Built 1977. Sufficiency rating: 90.7%. These are actually in pretty good shape all around.
The site is so slow that I’ve been unable to locate the Minneapolis bridge that collapsed, nor am I going to suffer through looking at every bridge in Harrisburg (there are dozens). But I recall reading that its sufficiency rating was 56%.












It’s unreal that the Harvey Taylor is considered the worst of the major bridges in Harrisburg. It was just resurfaced a few years ago. I know because I needed an alignment done on my car after commuting across it four times a day.
Mike | Aug 3, 2007 | Reply
I don’t think our roads around here are really that bad, with a few exceptions. Then again, being born and raised in Pennsylvania …
I’ll add this here because there’s really nowhere else to go with it. Nancy, who lives in LA, often complains about their rush-hour traffic. I’ve driven in LA rush hour. LA rush hour means that you’re putting along at 15-20 mph. Compare this with 83 at 4:30, and you’ve got nothing.
floor9 | Aug 10, 2007 | Reply
And along the same lines, why does everyone from LA prefix their highways with “the”? It’s always “the 405″ or “the 10″. You never hear anyone from LA say “Yeah, I got on 405″. Fortunately, you also never hear anyone from Harrisburg say “Yeah, I got on the 81″.
floor9 | Aug 10, 2007 | Reply