Fox vs Clinton
By floor9 on Sep 25, 2006 in Politics
I can’t even come up with an introduction worthy of this goldmine:
Wallace: “Do you think you did enough (to capture Bin Laden)?”
Clinton: “No, because I didn’t get him.”
Wallace: “Well.”
Clinton: “But at least I tried.”
Some thorough pwnage continues as Wallace, realizing what’s happening, attempts to back off. Clinton, as they say, has none of it, and Wallace is reduced to interrupting and pashaw-ing. It’s always good to see Fox get called out for what they are, especially when it’s by someone as PR-savvy as Bill Clinton.
“Bill Clinton … was offered Osama bin Laden by the Sudanese government, and they turned the offer down. They could have taken him into custody and begun unraveling his terrorist network 6 years ago [1996]. But they didn’t.”
hbg7986 | Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
And Bush was warned in January of 2001 that we urgently needed reconnaissance on al Qaeda, but we didn’t act. The Bush administration’s defense? Clinton didn’t draw up a battle plan. Where do you want to go with this?
floor9 | Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
You’re kidding right?
Clinton although very intelligent is an ass. Nothing more than a politicially correct machine. He could have kept us from 911 but chose not to. It’s unbelievable how many of you he can fool by his “feel your pain” crap. American really are dopes.
BB | Oct 3, 2006 | Reply